2nd Quote for
June 2009:
"Too bad if a governor had to go missing it couldn't have been the
governor of Alaska. You know, Sarah Palin." Senator John F. Kerry
[Political opinions aside, what kind of man makes such a statement?]
1st Quote for
June 2009:
"Them Jews aren't going to let him talk to me. I told my baby
daughter that he'll talk to me in five years when he's a lame duck, or in
eight years when he's out of office. ...They will not let him talk to
somebody who calls a spade what it is." -- Rev. Jeremiah Wright,
asked if he's talked to Obama since he became president.
Quote for March
2009:
"In Washington it's a little bit like American Idol, except everybody
is Simon Cowell." -- Barack Obama
[yes, and Mr. Obama is Sanjaya.]
Go
for a Walk
AMC
Local Walks:
http://amcboston.org/walks
Note
to readers: Plenty of older items from the main page were moved
to the following Notes Pages:
2009
CCJ Notes
2008
CCJ Notes
2007
CCJ Notes
2006
CCJ Notes
2005
CCJ Notes
2004
CCJ Notes
2003
CCJ Notes
Fall
2002 Notes
Spring-Summer
2002 Notes
Winter
2002 Notes
2001
Notes
Quote
for Feb 2009 - "You never want a serious crisis to go to
waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think
you could not do before." - White House Chief of Staff Rahm
Emanuel, Nov 2008.
Feb
2009 - Even if you despise Fox News, you may find
interesting this YouTube
video about the roots of the current financial difficulties.
Nov
2008 - Change even I can believe in: "Brothers should pull
up their pants. You are walking by your mother, your grandmother, your
underwear is showing. What's wrong with that? Come on. Some people might
not want to see your underwear. I'm one of them." -- President-elect
Barack Obama
Quote for
March 2008 (on a recent study on casinos): While opponents of gambling
in Massachusetts have disputed his methods, Clyde W. Barrow, the center's
director and an authority on the economic impact of gambling, said the
figures show that “gambling revenue is resilient, even in the face of an
economic downturn.” (Boston
Globe article)
We're
waiting for the next study on alcoholism and narcotics addiction in which
these may also be called “resilient in the face of an economic downturn.”

Quote for February:
“For the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of
my country, and not just because Barack has done well, but because I think
people are hungry for change.” -- Michelle
Obama (Barack's wife) at a Milwaukee, WI campaign event.
Is this really the first time? Surely
there must have been something about the USA that gave her positive
feelings before her husband Barack Obama wanted the top job? Does hubby
Barack share her negative impressions about the United States? Perhaps
these are “just words.”
Good
quote for December:
"I mean, talk about a direct IV into the vein of your support. It's a
very efficient way to communicate. They regurgitate exactly and put up on
their blogs what you said to them. It is something that we've cultivated
and have really tried to put quite a bit of focus on."
-- former White House communications director Dan Bartlett, on
conservative blogs
Good
quote for August: “By now, the political blogosphere is to
the left what talk radio is to the right. It is a forceful, sometimes
demagogic, message-monger organizing tool for the progressive end of the
Democratic Party.”
- Ellen Goodman, Boston Globe, Aug 10, 2007 column "E-male"
In
Memory
Interesting
Fact: Did you know that the color on the top of a fire hydrant
indicates the flow rate of water from that hydrant?
Blue: 1500+ gal/minute
Green: 1000-1499 gal/min
Orange: 500-999 gal/min
Red: <500 gal/min
Favorite
Quote for June: “He told me...that, as a martyr, he would
have been granted 72 virgins. This didn't seem quite the moment to point
out that there is a lively, ongoing debate among scholars of Islam as to
whether the 72 promised virgins might, in fact, only be 72 raisins.”
-- The New Republic's Peter Bergen, on an interview with a would-be
suicide bomber
Yet
Another Favorite Quote for May: “If they f*** with me or
Shaha, I have enough on them to f*** them too.”
-- Paul Wolfowitz, referring to several senior staff members at
the World Bank
Favorite
Quote for May: “And as for the one Mormon running for office,
those that really believe in God will defeat him anyway, so don't worry
about that.”
-- Nationally renowned bigot and opportunist Al Sharpton comment on
Mitt Romney
April's
favorite quote: “Quoting Robert Winters, a math instructor at
Harvard, who is alleged to be an FBI informant, is like asking the Pope
about religion.”
-- By R.B.,
April 18, 2007
City
Council Rules
2006-2007
[Rule 26 amended Feb 27, 2006]
City
Council Goals - FY2008-2009
City
Council Goals - FY2006-2007
2005
Cambridge
Election Fun Facts
2005
Cambridge
Candidate Pages
The
City Clerks and
City Managers
of Cambridge
“Every municipality has its quirks. In
Newton, the unofficial anthem is ‘Kumbaya.’ The Cambridge City Council
will undoubtedly pass a resolution demanding that yoga be an Olympic
sport. Supposedly urbane Boston has an otherwise good mayor that no one
can understand.”
- Brian McGrory,
Boston Globe, Nov 19, 2004
City
of Cambridge
web site
Boston
Globe
Cambridge
Chronicle
Harvard
Crimson
|
Will
the real traitor
please stand up?
“For
the majority leader of the United States Senate, in the time of war,
with soldiers dying on the ground, announcing that we have lost the
war, is very close to treasonous. I looked it up while we were
driving over here, what the definition of 'treason' is. It's the
betrayal of trust.”
-- Tom DeLay, 2007
“I
cannot support a failed foreign policy....President Clinton has
never explained to the American people why he was involving the US
military in a civil war in a sovereign nation, other than to say it
is for humanitarian reasons, a new military-foreign policy
precedent. Was it worth it to stay in Vietnam to save face? What
good has been accomplished so far? Absolutely nothing.”
-- then-House Majority Whip Tom Delay, 1999, a month into the
US mission in Kosovo
“As
democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and
more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and
glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's
desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright
moron.”
July 26, 1920, H.L. Mencken
Ron Suskind's essay:
Without
a Doubt
NY Times Magazine,
Oct 17, 2004
“To announce that there must be no criticism of
the president, or that we are to stand by the president right or
wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally
treasonable to the American public.”
-- Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
Bush Advisor Karl Rove, p. 78 of the February 19
& 26, 2001 issue of the New Yorker:
[ on education plan in general ] ... “The tax cuts will make the
economy grow. As people do better, they start voting like
Republicans -- unless they have too much education and vote
Democratic, which proves there can be too much of a good thing.”
Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as
when they do it from religious conviction. – Blaise Pascal
History
Repeats
“Of course the people
don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who
determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the
people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a
parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the
people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is
easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and
denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the
country to greater danger.”
-- Herman Goering at the Nuremberg trials
“I just don’t think we should go hellfire
damnation around the globe freeing people, unless it is directly
related to our own national security.”
-- Gerald R. Ford
|
Cambridge
approves
smoking ban
Notes
on the Rent Control Initiative Petition of 2003

Recommended Reading:
FIXING
ELECTIONS: THE FAILURE OF AMERICA'S WINNER-TAKE-ALL POLITICS
by Steven Hill
Election
2002
Graffiti Hotline:
617-349-6955
MassINC
City
Council Goals with City Manager's Key Implementation Goals
(6 page PDF)
Harvard
Square 1982
Contact
the CCJ
with news, questions,
requests, comments
Download your free Adobe
Acrobat Reader for reading and printing PDF formatted documents.
Did you drink your two
liters of water today?
Don't
Get Towed!
Sign up for street sweeping reminders at http://bostonsweeper.boston.com
National
Do Not Call Registry
Add your phone number(s) to the registry.
|
|
Let
the Games Begin! (July 2 update)
Candidates begin taking out nomination papers for City Council and
School Committee
Today
is the first day that candidates can pull papers for this year's
municipal election. As of 5:00pm on July 2, here are the
candidates who have pulled papers:
| Name |
Office |
Signatures submitted |
Signatures certified |
| Edward J. Sullivan |
City Council |
- |
- |
| E. Denise Simmons |
City Council |
- |
- |
| Charles J.
Marquardt |
City Council |
- |
- |
| David P. Maher |
City Council |
- |
- |
| Philip R. Fenstermacher |
City Council |
- |
- |
| Neal Leavitt |
City Council |
- |
- |
| Minka vanBeuzekom |
City Council |
- |
- |
| Larry Ward |
City Council |
- |
- |
| Silvia P. Glick |
City Council |
- |
- |
| Timothy J. Toomey |
City Council |
- |
- |
| Sylvia Barnes |
City Council |
- |
- |
| Kenneth E. Reeves |
City Council |
- |
-- |
| Alan Steinert, Jr. |
School Committee |
- |
- |
| Fred Fantini |
School
Committee |
- |
- |
| James Williamson |
City Council |
- |
- |
| Mark F. Flanagan |
City Council |
- |
- |
| Benjamin Leland
Cheung |
City Council |
- |
- |
| Sam Seidel |
City Council |
- |
- |
| Tom Stohlman |
City Council |
- |
- |
| Marjorie Decker |
City Council |
- |
- |
| Henrietta Davis |
City Council |
- |
- |
| M. Kevin Moore |
School Committee |
- |
- |
| Marc McGovern |
School Committee |
- |
- |
| Patricia M. Nolan |
School Committee |
- |
- |
| Richard Harding |
School Committee |
- |
- |
| Richard Harding |
City Council |
- |
- |
| Joseph Grassi |
School Committee |
- |
- |
|
Check out this year's Cambridge
Candidate Pages.
20 people have now pulled papers
for City Council and 7 for School Committee. Candidates
still expected: Craig Kelley (CC), Gregg Moree (CC),
Nancy Tauber (SC), Alice Turkel (SC). [Note: Richard
Harding pulled papers for both.] |
|
|
June
29, 2009 City Council Agenda Highlights
This
is the last City Council meeting before the summer break. (The next
meetings will be on July 27 and Sept 14.) Significant agenda items
include:
City
Mgr's Agenda #4: A Planning Board recommendation on the
Vehicle-sharing Parking Facilities Petition (which today means
ZipCar but which could involve other companies in the future).
City
Mgr's Agenda #6: A proposed Home Rule Petition to be
submitted to the State Legislature entitled "An Act Relative to
the Provision of Services to the City of Cambridge by the Cambridge
Energy Alliance". [Follow the link for the complete text of the
Home Rule Petition.]
On
the Table #2: That the City Manager is requested to make
available adequate funds to the City Council so that the City
Council can hire its own legal expert to review relevant issues in
pending litigation.
This
matter is still not resolved and this could be taken from the table
and taken up if there are five votes to do it (and there won't be
further discussion about it - except on the campaign trail - until
the next meeting at the end of July).
Order
#2. That the City Council go on record requesting that the
Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities, and Energy
maintain the existing State laws governing cable licensing, which
adequately protect cities and towns, residents of the Commonwealth
by defeating House Bill No.3765 and Senate Bill No.1531, An Act
Promoting Consumer Choice and Competition. Councillor
Davis
This
Order would oppose a bill promoted by Verizon that aims to minimize
the cable licensing process and, some would argue, give Verizon a
competitive advantage over Comcast. The current process now obliges
Comcast to provide funding for local cable access provider CCTV, and
its Executive Director Susan Fleischmann has been making the case
that Verizon should have to fulfill similar obligations. Lest anyone
try to portray Verizon as the bad guy and Comcast as the good guy,
it's worth noting that Comcast just sent out a letter to its analog
cable customers informing them that their service is about to be
"enhanced" to the "World of More." What Comcast
means by the "World of More" is that analog cable
customers will be seeing their cable TV bills quadruple this
October or else have most of their stations disappear when Comcast
will eliminate its analog cable option. Comcast has mastered Orwellian
language. They actually say they will enhance your cable
TV package by eliminating service and dramatically increasing the
cost of service. Welcome to the World of More. - Robert
Winters |
June 26 - Journalism
in the era of Twitter (Ellen Goodman, Boston Globe)
June 24 - Boston
to begin single-stream recycling starting July 1 (Boston Globe)
Note: This may also be coming to Cambridge at some point.
|
July
Programs at Fresh Pond Reservation
These events are FREE and open to
the public. Children are welcome in the company of an adult.
|
TREES
OF FRESH POND: 6 Sundays: July 5 through August
9, 1 to 3pm. We will meet at the site of each program:
July 5 Kingsley Park; July 12
Kingsley Park Bowl to Weir Meadow
July 19 The Weir Meadow; July 26
Little Fresh Pond
August 2 Black's Nook; August 9
Lusitania Wet Meadow
Join us for one, several, or all of 6 consecutive Sunday afternoons
in July and August, and learn to identify many of the more than 50
tree species growing on the Reservation. During each program we'll
observe the leaves, bark and buds of 12 trees, use keys for
identification, create leaf rubbings, and map locations so that you
can revisit the trees on your own. At the end of the series, you
will know how to identify many trees in the summer, and you will
have your own field guide. Register with Ranger Jean at 617-349-4793
for meeting information. |
SUMMER BIRD WALK
Date: Sunday, July 12
Time: 7:30 to 9:30am
Place: Neville Place Driveway, 650 Concord Ave.
Early morning is the best time to look for birds
during the summer, because birds are most active when the air is
cool and they are hungry for breakfast. We may find adults feeding
babies in the nest, and fledglings that are following their parents
and chirping for food. As always, beginning birders are welcome. We
have binoculars to lend and will show you how to use them. |
A TOUR OF THE WATER
PURIFICATION FACILITY
Date: Monday, July 13
Time: 6:00 to 7:30pm
Place: Walter J. Sullivan Water Purification Facility
Come learn how water that falls as rain in the
western suburbs is transported to Cambridge, purified into drinking
water in the Water Purification Facility, and piped to all of our
local homes and businesses. Members of the Cambridge Water
Department staff will describe the process, answer your questions,
and give the group a tour of the building. |
INVASIVE PLANTS
IDENTIFICATION
Date: Tuesday, July 14
Time: 6:00 to 8:00pm
Place: Water Purification Facility
Learn to identify the most common non-native
invasive plants that are having a negative impact on our yards,
gardens and natural areas. Jessica Korecki from the New England
Wildflower Society will lead this walk on the Reservation using our
own weeds as examples. |
A FRESH POND
RESERVATION WALKABOUT
Date: Monday, July 20
Time: 6:00 to 8:00pm
Place: Walter J. Sullivan Water Purification Facility, 250
Fresh Pond Pkwy
Chip Norton, Cambridge Watershed Manager, will
give a tour of Fresh Pond Reservation's conservation and recreation
areas. He also will use maps and diagrams to help illustrate the
goals for this major restoration project. Future Monday Evening
Walkabout dates: Aug 25, Sept 22. |
AN EVENING WALK IN THE
UPPER CAMBRIDGE WATERSHED
Date: Monday, July 27
Time: 6:00 to 8:00pm
Place: Walter J. Sullivan Water Purification Facility 250
Fresh Pond Pkwy
Chip Norton, Cambridge Watershed Manager will
lead us on a hike on City of Cambridge owned property in Lincoln and
Lexington, just north on Hobbs Brook Reservoir. We will review the
natural and cultural history data that has been collected as part of
the Hobbs Brook Watershed. We will carpool from the Water Department
parking lot, leaving promptly at 6:10pm. Registration is required! |
Please register for each event that
you plan to attend. You will receive information on parking after
you register. E-mail Elizabeth Wylde at friendsoffreshpond@yahoo.com
or call (617) 349-6489 and leave your name and phone number.
Offered by
Friends of Fresh Pond Reservation
Keep up to date on
events at the Pond: visit the Friends group website at http://friendsoffreshpond.org |
June
23 - Lesley/Porter Zoning Petition Adopted (reported by John Howard, Porter
Square Neighbors Association)
On
June 22 the Cambridge City Council voted 8-1 to create a Lesley Porter
Overlay District. This new overlay district rezones Lesley University's
Porter Square campus, including the former North Prospect Congregational
Church site, to allow Lesley to bring the Arts Institute of Boston to
Porter Square. It limits what Lesley could eventually build on the parking
lots behind and across Massachusetts Avenue from University Hall, although
Lesley has not proposed any specific plans for those sites. It also has
provisions to require open space and to encourage ground floor retail.
The
City Council also granted landmark status to the church, meaning that any
alteration to the church's exterior, or relocation of the church on its
lot, will require approval by the Historical Commission.
Lesley
University has submitted a related memorandum of understanding which
commits them to working with neighbors on construction mitigation,
providing courtesy parking during snow emergencies, ensuring adequate
parking during events, contributing to beautification along Massachusetts
Avenue between Harvard and Porter Squares, giving the public access to
Lesley facilities such as an art library, and long-term engagement with
the neighborhood.
This
is the outcome of nearly three years' negotiation by Lesley University,
City of Cambridge planning staff, neighborhood associations including PSNA
and Agassiz Baldwin, abutters, and other concerned citizens, to develop an
acceptable rezoning plan.
Discussion
by the City Council included the usual questions about traffic and
parking, impact on immediate abutters, construction mitigation, worry that
economic problems could cause the project to be suspended halfway through,
retail issues, and open space. Many of these concerns were addressed by
amendments worked out in an intensive dialog between Lesley, the City's
planning staff, and neighbors and abutters over the last several weeks.
Most of the councillors praised the civil tone of the dialog, the
dedication of both supporters and opponents, and the hard work of all
participants, and called for continuing engagement of all parties.
The
next major step in the process will be for Lesley to develop a specific
design for the Arts Institute of Boston project, for submission to a
special project review before the Planning Board as well as Historical
Commission review. That will take a while. There is lots more coming, but
at the moment we can hope for a respite. - John Howard
June 21 - Atlanta
Adopts New Housing Model - Boston Globe [....just something to
think about....]
|
June
22, 2009 City Council Agenda Highlights
It
is expected that the Lesley/Porter
zoning proposal will be voted at this meeting. There has been
plenty of public comment on the proposal - both in support and in
opposition. The related landmarking of the former North Prospect
Church at Roseland and Mass. Ave. is also expected be taken up.
There
was an aborted attempt at the last meeting to take off the Table the
item (#3
this week) that requests "to make available adequate funds
to the City Council so that the City Council can hire its own legal
expert to review relevant issues in pending litigation." The
item also includes Councillor Toomey's substitute motion, and both
relate to the matter before last week's Executive Session that
lasted more than two hours. I expect there will be another attempt
to take up this matter this Monday or next week - the last meeting
before the summer recess. A simple majority is required to take any
item from the Table and there appeared to be five votes last week to
take up this matter except that one member was absent at the time of
the vote, and a motion to reconsider the vote failed. If the matter
is taken up, things could get very contentious.
Speaking
of contentious, there's this:
Order
#4. That the City Manager is requested to review whether the
City of Cambridge, including the Cambridge Retirement System, has
any investments in which Evergreen Investment Management Company and
its affiliates are involved, and is further requested to divest
itself of any such investments that may exist, and to report back to
the City Council on his findings at the City Council Meeting on July
27, 2009. Councillor Toomey
What
makes this Order interesting is the fact that one of the
vice-presidents of the company named in the Order apparently just
co-authored a commentary in "America's oldest weekly
newspaper" ripping into the City Manager and all nine city
councillors over the matter of the City's AAA bond rating. These
co-authors imply in their screed that the City is being mismanaged
by its "reprehensible" city manager. This is an
interesting charge coming from someone in the leadership of a
company that just shelled out over $40 million to settle charges
from the Securities and Exchange Commission on top of a previous
$32.5 million settlement (according to the statement of Order #4).
It is worth noting that the aforementioned vice-president is a
resident of East Cambridge who reportedly intends to run for a
Cambridge City Council seat this year. This could be an interesting
election season.
The
meeting agenda is actually quite short, but with the zoning vote and
one or two potentially incendiary items, there may be a good show
Monday night. - Robert Winters |
|
June
15, 2009 City Council Agenda Highlights (and a few other
observations)
I
had an opportunity several days ago to run through the new Main
Library building, and it really is spectacular. It won't be open for
a while yet, but this is sure to be one of the grandest of all civic
spaces in Cambridge. Not only is the new addition breathtaking, the
restoration of the main reading room in the old building would make Frederick
Hastings Rindge quite pleased about what the current City
leadership has done to honor his remarkable gift. The landscaping
outside the library is shaping up to be more beautiful than I could
ever have imagined.
It's
now just a little more than two weeks until the official kickoff of
the biennial local political season when candidates can pull
nomination papers for City Council and School Committee (Wed, July
1). With the pulling of papers also comes the summer recess from
City Council and School Committee meetings. In the meantime, here
are some items of interest on this week's agenda:
City
Manager's Agenda #1. Transmitting communication from Robert W.
Healy, City Manager, relative to a request for the City Council to
vote to move to Executive Session immediately following the
conclusion of public comment for the purpose of discussing
litigation.
This
almost certainly relates to:
Tabled
Item #2. That the City Manager is requested to make available
adequate funds to the City Council so that the City Council can hire
its own legal expert to review relevant issues in pending
litigation.
The
matter at hand continues to be what happens next in the City's
appeal of last year's curious jury decision in the Monteiro v. City
of Cambridge case. In addition to the financial considerations and
what strategies may now be appropriate, there is some evidence of
political gamesmanship among some of the councillors as they
try to capitalize on the situation for political ends. The
opportunism doesn't stop at those councillors, of course. There are
also political puppeteers trying to capitalize on the case - people
who have contributed nothing toward the city or its citizens
and have nothing but disrespect for all of our elected
officials and everyone in the City administration. Criticism of
elected officials and of those who manage the city is fair game (I
do it myself now and again), but these words have little meaning
when spoken by those who have contributed nothing.
It's
anyone's guess how long the Executive Session will last this time,
nor does the agenda give any indication whether the substance of
Tabled Item #2 will be part of that discussion.
There
are five more citizen letters of support for the proposed
Lesley/Porter Overlay District zoning petition which is expected to
be voted at the June 22 meeting.
Among
the City Council Orders, the first one stands out:
Order
#1. That the City Manager is requested to report back to the
City Council on the potential use by City departments and staff of
social networking programs such as Twitter and Facebook.
Councillor Kelley
The
Manager's response on a related Order last week makes one wonder if
Councillor Kelley was even listening. Councillor Decker, the City
Manager, and one department head took Councillor Kelley to school at
that meeting on the topic of City programs making good use of
listservs and of the potential perils of using other "social
networking" devices. I expect we'll be hearing additional
lessons directed at Councillor Kelley by his colleagues at this
meeting. My suggestion is that when they start talking about this
topic everyone should call the City Council phone number or pummel
them with text messages.
Order
#10. That the City Manager is requested to direct the
Cambridge Police Department and the Department of Human Services to
convene a series of meetings with the Civic Unity Committee
immediately in Jefferson Park and invite the surrounding neighbors
to discuss the Boston Globe article concerning violence in the
neighborhood - the goal of the meeting is to provide a forum to
listen to resident concerns, provide current information and
resources available to help promote a safe and healthy neighborhood.
Councillor Decker
Two
weeks ago, an Order from Councillor Decker regarding banning the use
of cell phones while driving was referred to the Civic Unity
Committee rather than to the more appropriate Ordinance Committee.
There's a meeting of the Civic Unity Committee on July 1 "to
explore the possibility of creating small scale solar panels that
would enable the powering of small household items." Now comes
another Order calling for the Civic Unity Committee to take up a
matter that seems more appropriately referred to the Public Safety
Committee. Are the functions of these City Council committees
completely arbitrary?
There
are other items of interest on the agenda, but we'll leave it at
that for now and wait to see what, if anything, comes out of the
Executive Session on Monday night. Election year politics can be
ever so ridiculous. - Robert Winters |
|
June
8, 2009 City Council Agenda Highlights
There
not a whole lot on the agenda this week. Perhaps the meatiest item
is the pending ordination of the zoning amendment for the Lesley
Porter Overlay District. All 15 of the Communications are from
residents expressing their points of view both for and against the
proposed zoning change. The City Council has until the end of the
month to vote on this (the last meeting before the summer break is
June 29), and though there are few outstanding issues, the Ordinance
Committee report on the matter indicates that the vote on
ordination will likely take place at the June 22 City Council
meeting. There's also a new zoning petition received from Jean
Connor, et al., requesting the City Council to amend the Zoning Map
from its current designation as a Residence C-1 to a Residence B
District in the area of Garden, Winslow, Fenno, Stearns, Esten,
Sherman Streets and Upland Road. This was the subject of much public
comment last week.
Of
the Council Orders, the only one that jumps out is Order #8 from
Councillor Decker that proposes a smoking ban in all Cambridge
public parks. The complete text of the order is:
O-8
June 8, 2009
COUNCILLOR DECKER
WHEREAS: We are aware of the negative health effects of second hand
smoke; and
WHEREAS: Cambridge was one of the first cities to ban smoking in
restaurants and public buildings; now therefore be it
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to confer
with the appropriate departments to implement the immediate ban of
smoking in all Cambridge public parks; and be it further
ORDERED: That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to report
back to the City Council on this matter.
You
would be hard-pressed to find anyone more anti-smoking than me, so
I'm not so alarmed by this Order. However, there is a certain irony
in how this City Council raises red flags about the perceived
infringement of civil liberties with surveillance cameras and red
light enforcement cameras, yet they may embrace a ban on this
relatively benign activity in public parks which are, dare I
suggest, rather well ventilated. I think it's fair to characterize
the second hand smoke argument offered here as "just blowing
smoke." - Robert Winters |
June
7, 2009 - One upon a time there was a civic organization
in Cambridge known as the Cambridge Civic Association (CCA). It was formed
in 1945 out of several organizations that had been existed through the
1930s and that had lobbied the state legislature to create the Plan E
Charter option (1938) which featured a city manager form of government and
proportional representation elections for city council and school
committee. These reforms were central to model charter reform movements
active in the United States from the early 1900s. The central theme of the
CCA in its early days was "good government" in the sense of
being anti-patronage and for professionally managed local government. This
changed with the introduction of rent control at the end of the 1960s
after which the CCA shifted leftward and became permanently lashed to the
mast of the rent control vessel. Though the CCA still exists on paper (I
believe), it rapidly declined after the statewide abolition of rent
control (late 1994) and essentially disappeared a decade later (early
2005).
I
bring up the ghost of the CCA today only to point out that when it was
created it had some very admirable goals. Here's the original Mission
Statement of the CCA:
Purposes:
This association is formed for the following purposes:
1.
To promote businesslike, honest, and efficient conduct of local
government, open to public scrutiny.
2.
To induce residents to take an active interest in the affairs of the City
of Cambridge.
3.
To encourage and support the candidacy of men and women seeking election
to public office and to support intelligent, wholesome leadership in
public affairs.
4.
To assure that the best qualified persons are appointed to positions in
the City government after consideration of all qualified candidates.
5.
To promote among the citizens of Cambridge equitable distribution and
benefit of public services and equal opportunity for economic security,
education, and social advancement.
These
are pretty good founding principles for a civic organization and I'm
tempted to say that some should be incorporated into the recently adopted City
Council's Goals for FY2010 (adopted Feb 2, 2009). In fact, of the
22 current goals, the only one that comes close is: "An increased
level of recruitment and opportunities for membership on boards and
commissions." The current Council goals emphasize things like
"fostering community" via block parties and such, though one has
to wonder if the City should be promoting these activities or just getting
out of the way so that people can foster community on their own. The
goals also seem to put some emphasis on developing "successful
nightlife campaigns" while mentioning nothing about promoting
ordinary "daytime" economic activity that supports the everyday
needs of residents.
One
founding principle of the CCA that fell into disuse over the years is
listed above as #3: To encourage and support the candidacy of men
and women seeking election to public office and to support intelligent,
wholesome leadership in public affairs. Indeed, I can personally
testify to the fact that in its dying years the only reason the CCA made
endorsements at all was because the CCA-endorsed incumbents wanted the
benefit of having an advertised CCA slate of candidates that would help
secure their reelection. There was precious little effort to recruit new
candidates or to support them. Today, the benefits of incumbency are
greater than ever. The cost of political campaigns have become absurdly
high and most of the incumbents now have (City paid) staff who are
inevitably political appointees who directly or indirectly assist in the
reelection efforts of their bosses. The deck is increasingly stacked
against challengers. Furthermore, the salary and benefits for elected
councillors are now so sweet that it is unlikely that any of them would
ever want to move on to another job.
With
this background in mind, I would like to encourage all Cambridge residents
to help level the playing field by finding out about this year's
challengers for seats on the Cambridge City Council and the Cambridge
School Committee. This is not meant as a dig against any particular
incumbent as much as an appeal to support the challengers in what is a
difficult and laudable effort. Please see the Cambridge
Candidate Pages for the current list of expected candidates. Then
use your own judgment - don't expect me or anyone else to do it for you.
Speaking
of this year's municipal election, there are some activists who are now
expending great effort to attack the City Manager and most of the current
City Council. That is not nor has it ever been the intention of the
Cambridge Civic Journal or its editor. Candidates are now being
seduced by financial promises from one angry fellow with a Brattle Street
address and a basketful of grudges. Former CCA Executive Board members
from its darkest and most manipulative days are oozing up from the civic
swamp trying to at last make good on their failed campaigns of the early
1990s to oust city manager Bob Healy.
It's
entertaining to watch people who have primarily earned disrespect in their
civic efforts try to capitalize on the recent Monteiro jury decision as a
means of realizing their decades-old vendettas. Conveniently forgotten in
their recent letters to Cambridge's "oldest weekly newspaper"
are the many achievements of City Manager Bob Healy, the strong financial
position of the City, and the recent 8-1 vote of confidence bestowed upon
Mr. Healy in granting him a three year contract extension. Also missing in
this testimony is the fact that virtually all affirmative action in the
hiring of employees and department heads has taken place on Mr. Healy's
watch. These letters also fail to divulge how long these writers have been
carrying their jealousy and anger toward Mr. Healy for actually
orchestrating progress in Cambridge while the best they could ever do is
snipe from the sidelines. - Robert Winters
Updated
List of all Cambridge Boards & Commissions and their current members
(as of June 3, 2009)
|
June
1, 2009 City Council Agenda Highlights
The
800 pound gorilla in the room this week is the unresolved
matter of the Council's challenge of the City Manager over
continuing legal action after the recent jury decision in the case
of Monteiro v. City of Cambridge. When the FY2010
Budget was voted at the May 18 City Council meeting, Councillor
Kelley moved that the portion of the Law Department budget that
covers the cost for outside legal counsel not be approved. After the
City Manager pointed out that this Budget is used for a range of
activities having nothing to do with this specific case, the motion
was defeated on a 4-4-1 vote with Councillors Kelley, Reeves,
Seidel, and Simmons voting YES; Councillors Davis, Maher, Toomey,
and Ward voting NO; and Councillor Decker voting to ABSTAIN. While
the ultimate intentions of Councillor Decker are unknown, she is to
be congratulated for preventing this reckless action.
The
matter didn't stop there. There was still Order
#2 by Councillors Kelley, Simmons, and Reeves (such good
friends) which stated: "That the City Manager is requested
to make available adequate funds to the City Council so that the
City Council can hire its own legal expert to review relevant issues
in pending litigation." Anyone familiar with the Plan E Charter
knows that the City Council is prohibited from directly engaging in
personnel matters, so this Order is highly problematic. Unstated in
the Order was how a Council not known for its mutuality might
actually decide on legal counsel. There is also the question of what
would happen if the Council's counsel (sorry, couldn't resist)
radically disagreed with the opinion of the City's Law Department.
It
is the proper role for the City Council to establish general
policies not particular to any specific case, and that includes
legal and employment matters. They can do this by an Order (really a
formal request) or by Ordinance (such as when they establish a
commission with staff - arguably the reason we find ourselves in
this mess in the first place). Councillor Toomey, to his credit,
understands the Charter and the potential hazards of publicly
discussing pending litigation. He introduced a Substitute
Order which referred the matter to the City Solicitor for a
legal opinion. After an extended Executive Session, the Council
unanimously voted to table both the original Order and Toomey's
substitute. That matter could be taken up this week and more
Executive Sessions will surely follow. Meanwhile the City has filed
an appeal of the most recent court ruling now that post-trial
motions appear to have run their course.
This
is probably not the place to go into the whole history of the Monteiro
v. City of Cambridge case, but since the newspaper reports have
been so thoroughly lacking, there are a few things that
should be stated. Malvina Monteiro was the Executive Director of the
Cambridge Police Review & Advisory Board (PRAB) which was
established by a 1984 ordinance. The job of the executive director
was established as a full-time job with duties that were part-time
at best. At some point, perhaps out of boredom or a desire to move
up, Monteiro enrolled as a full-time student at Tufts while still
working "full-time" at the PRAB. She also sought a City
scholarship. When she did not receive the scholarship, she filed a
joint (racial) discrimination complaint (1998) along with Marian
Hampton (Library Dept.) and Mary Wong (Kid's Council). At the time
of the discrimination complaint, the City Manager stated that the
City must on occasion "take corrective action
when performance and expectations are not met. In those cases we
attempt, whenever possible, to work with the employee to improve
performance. . . . If that is not successful, disciplinary action
may be required."
By
early 1999, Linda Stamper of the City's Law Dept. joined the
complaint. Eventually, several others joined the complaint that was
being pursued by lawyer Ellen Zucker, formerly the president of the
Boston Chapter of the National Organization of Women (NOW). [As a
side note, Zucker's spouse is Ellen Clegg who was until recently the
deputy managing editor for news operations for the Boston Globe and
previously served as the editor of the Globe's City Weekly.]
Florencia LaChance who briefly worked for the City as Manager of
Employment Services also joined the complaint.
The
City filed for Summary Judgment and in February 2003 a
Justice of the Superior Court ruled that the LaChance and
Hampton complaints should be dismissed. However the Wong, Monteiro,
and Stamper cases were allowed to proceed through the legal system.
By this time, the Monteiro complaint also included a charge of
retaliation (she was fired) for having filed the original complaint.
Consequently a jury failed to reach a verdict in the Monteiro case,
but a subsequent jury trial led to a May 23, 2008 award of $962,400
in back and front pay and damages, $100,000 for emotional distress,
and (ch-ching!) $3,500,000 in punitive damages. The City, of course,
filed motions challenging this jury award. Nonetheless, in April
2009 a different Superior Court judge denied the City's motion. This
only sets the stage for an appeal to a higher court. The question
that is now being tossed about and politicized is whether the
City should pay the judgment even if it is believed to be
excessive and improper and avoid any future legal costs. The
Stamper complaint and the Wong complaint (Wong is still Exec.
Director of the Kid's Council) are still pending. [By the way, I'm a
mathematician and not a lawyer, so please forgive (or correct) any
misinterpretations of all the legal mumbo-jumbo.]
There
are other policy aspects to this matter that should be discussed by
the City Council but will almost certainly not be discussed. The
administrative functions of the Police Review & Advisory Board
were merged with the Human Rights Commission several years ago. Both
commissions were established by ordinance in 1984 and always had
overlapping functions. This administrative consolidation should
have happened long ago, and it can be argued that such a
consolidation may have prevented the conditions that led to the
Monteiro case in the first place. It is, after all, not so easy to
attend a full-time college program when you have actual work
responsibilities. At the recent Budget hearings, Councillor Seidel
indirectly asked about consolidation of some of the City boards and
commissions but them quickly retreated when the City
administration expressed interest in the concept. It is a fact that
some City commissions (such as the Peace Commission) have become
sacred cows whose purpose is rarely questioned by elected officials
even though their functions are often vague and could easily be
absorbed into other City departments.
Enough
said about the 800 pound gorilla. Back to the rest of the agenda:
City
Manager's Agenda #6. Transmitting communication from Robert W.
Healy, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 09-53,
regarding a report on the status
of the Malik Academy lease.
Order
#13. That the City Council go on record asking Winn Management
and Homeowners Rehab, Inc. to respond immediately to the City
Council on their decision to provide Malik Academy, at the very
least, a short-term resolution allowing for the continued operation
of the pre-school and the child-care facilities for the next school
year. Councillor Decker and Councillor Reeves
Normally,
an item like this wouldn't even attract my attention. However, at
the previous Council meeting there was much public comment on this
topic and most of it suggested some kind of unfair treatment of this
religious school. It was especially interesting to note that in
spite of suggestions by councillors and during public comment that
the loss of Malik Academy would be a blow to Cambridge pre-school
facilities, the new tenant will be another pre-school. According to
the response from Homeowner's Rehab (HRI), Malik Academy was given a
temporary sweet deal at $15/sq. ft. and were asked to pay $16/sq.
ft., something that should have been no surprise since they were
aware at the original signing that they should expect a small
increase. When the time came to sign a new lease, they insisted on a
decrease. None of this was mentioned at the previous Council
meeting. In the end, HRI rented the space to another pre-school at
$22/sq. ft.
City
Manager's Agenda #10. Transmitting communication from Robert W.
Healy, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number 09-51,
regarding a report on the status of the Harvard Senior Picnic. [The
Harvard Senior Picnic, which is hosted by the Mayor's Office in
conjunction with Harvard University, is scheduled to go forward as
planned on Wed, July 29, 2009.]
Again,
this item should barely warrant being noticed, but the ALARM
expressed at the previous Council meeting was noteworthy. Skeptics
other than me have suggested that the real purpose of this event is
for local political candidates to work the captive crowd in their
relentless quest for votes from a population (senior citizens) who
can generally be counted on to vote in local elections. If you've
even witnessed this event, you will understand the skepticism.
Tabled
Item #2. That the City Manager is requested to make available
adequate funds to the City Council so that the City Council can hire
its own legal expert to review relevant issues in pending
litigation. [Tabled on motion of Councillor Davis Order Number Two
of May 18, 2009 together with motion to amend by substitution
submitted by Councillor Toomey.]
See
above.
Order
#4. That the City Manager is requested to confer with the
appropriate departments to explore the possibility of banning the
use of cell phones and text messaging while driving in Cambridge.
Councillor Decker
Excellent
idea, but unfortunately superseded by state law that permits cell
phone use while driving. Fortunately, recent events have motivated
the glacial state legislature to ban text messaging while driving.
Why anyone would vote to permit this dangerous practice at all is
beyond comprehension. Then again, you can't legislative stupidity
away.
Order
#5. Urge Governor Deval Patrick to issue an executive order
requiring all new homes and businesses to be zero net energy
buildings by 2030. Councillor Davis
This
is part of a group of three Orders from Council Davis in this same
spirit. A definition of "zero net energy buildings" would
be helpful.
Order
#9. Urge the Cambridge Legislative Delegation and Governor
Patrick to support and vote in favor of updating the Massachusetts
Container Beverage Law. Councillor Davis
This
is also a good intention and probably a net positive idea, but there
is an inefficiency in asking residents to schlep additional
containers to supermarkets and redemption centers when they can just
put them out in their recycling bins. Many will do just that, so the
great beneficiaries of this proposal will be the scavengers raiding
residential set-outs for deposit bottles. We can only hope that the
survival and expansion and redemption centers are factored into this
proposed law. For those of us who already recycle to the maximum
extent, this change is actually a net inconvenience. - Robert
Winters |
Cambridge
City Solicitor Don Drisdell takes the Cambridge Chronicle to task
(May 26, 2009)
[while the Chronicle continues to get its legal advice from the
goose guy]
Related documents:
Judge
MacLeod-Mancuso's rejection of post-trial motions (April, 2009)
Monteiro jury
verdict (May 2008)
Summary judgment
on City's motion to dismiss (February 2003)
|
May
18, 2009 City Council Agenda Highlights
The
central item of business is the vote on the FY2010 Budget. Even
though this was supposed to be "a tough budget year," this
year's Budget sailed through the Finance Committee's budget hearings
like green corn goes through the new May. The Council will likely
take up the Budget vote (Committee Reports #1-3) early in the
meeting before taking up the rest of the agenda. There are a few
other items of interest, such as:
Order
#2. That the City Manager is requested to make available
adequate funds to the City Council so that the City Council can hire
its own legal expert to review relevant issues in pending
litigation. Councillor Kelley, Mayor Simmons and
Councillor Reeves
This
is a serious Order with potentially serious consequences. The City
is dealing with the consequences of a jury decision to award an
absurd amount of money to a former City employee (Malvina Monteiro)
who went fishing for cash and reeled in a big one. The City appealed
the jury decision, but the latest appeal was denied. Other lawsuits
against the City filed by the same lawyer (Ellen Zucker) are waiting
in the wings and the City is continuing to spend cash for outside
legal counsel in the Monteiro case. Some city councillors have
suggested that the City should just pay out this ridiculous jury
award, cut its losses, and not pursue any further appeals. The City
Manager has stated that he has no intention of paying a dime toward
a legal decision he and others in his administration feel is without
merit.
One
has to wonder how this City Council would go about deciding who its
"legal expert" would be if this Order were to pass. Would
Councillors Kelley, Simmons, and Reeves make the call? Could there
be five votes for someone they could all agree on? The truth is that
we have a City Solicitor who is a good lawyer who is very
well-versed in the Monteiro case as well as the other pending cases,
and it's likely that the city councillors heard an earful at last
week's Executive Session on this matter. Could it be that the 3
sponsors of this Order simply didn't like what they heard in
Executive Session? It will be VERY interesting to see if this Order
gets 5 votes in its current form.
Order
#5. That the City Manager is requested to work with the Traffic,
Parking and Transportation Department to disseminate information to
bicyclists through various methods of communication reminding them
of the "rules of the road" pertaining to bicycles and that
their adherence is important to the safety of motorists, pedestrians
and fellow cyclists. Vice Mayor Seidel
Been
there, done that.
Order
#9. That the City Manager and the Mayor are requested to report
to the Council on the status of the Harvard Senior Picnic.
Councillor Decker
It
should be pointed out that the Harvard Senior Picnic has always been
a prime campaign spot for City Council and School Committee
candidates. Heaven forbid that the rumor turns out to be true and
the picnic is not held this year. Perhaps Harvard could lay off a
janitor or two to cover the costs of the picnic. - RW |
An Inconvenient Truth - Global
warming study sees smaller shift in sea levels (Boston Globe, May
15, 2009)
Keep doing the home insulation and the compact fluorescent bulbs, folks,
but perhaps a little less alarm would be in order, even if that's
inconvenient for your larger political goals. - RW
|
May
11, 2009 City Council Agenda Highlights
City
Manager's Agenda #1. Transmitting communication from Robert W.
Healy, City Manager, relative to a Planning Board recommendation
on the Lesley University zoning petition to extend the boundaries
of the Business C zoning district in Porter Square and create a
new Lesley Porter Overlay District.
This
item is noteworthy only because the Planning Board
"enthusiastically" favors the petition. You don't
usually get such an emphatic statement from the Planning Board.
The Porter Square Neighbors Association (PSNA) has been generally
supportive of most of the proposed changes, at least from what
I've seen on their listserv messages. What seems to be driving
this enthusiasm is the relocation of the Art Institute of Boston
(part of Lesley University) to the Porter Square area with the
hope that this will positively change the character of the area.
The option of restoring the stockyards was not discussed. Art is
the new beef.
City
Manager's Agenda #5. Transmitting communication from Robert W.
Healy, City Manager, relative the Final Landmark Designation Study
Report for the Shell Spectacular Sign at 187 Magazine Street at
the corner of Memorial Drive.
I'm
a local history buff - as anyone who's seen my bookshelves will
attest. That said, I'm not quite to the point of viewing a gas
station sign as an historic landmark. The Cambridge Historical
Commission has a 24 page report on the landmarking of the sign.
The irony is that if some commercial enterprise (particularly a
multinational corporation) were to today propose erecting such a
sign in Cambridge, it would likely be fiercely opposed.
City
Manager's Agenda #7. Transmitting communication from Robert W.
Healy, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number
09-38, regarding a report on methods and policies that are in
place to guarantee that all residents have equal access to city
information and services.
Order
#19. Urge the Massachusetts Legislative Delegation to be aware
of the need for universal broadband access for all members of the
public and the elimination of the digital divide.
Councillor Davis
These
items are noteworthy primarily because of their partial
nonresponse to the Order of the
previous meeting. That order primarily addressed the fact that
some people choose to obtain information via methods other
than Internet access either because of disability or personal
preference. The Manager's response essentially says that you can
read Legal Notices in the Cambridge Chronicle, go to a computer at
a public library or other City facility, or read the semiannual CityView
newsletter. This is all well and good, but I believe the real
point of the original Order was to ensure that residents can get a
verbal or mailed response to any reasonable information request
made to any City department. Regarding Councillor Davis' Order, it
would be interesting to see what the latest figures are on the
"digital divide" in Cambridge. I suspect that many of
those whom Davis wants to reach are already twittering away on
their cellphones and texting their way down the streets and
sidewalks of Cambridge. It's no longer a matter of who can open a
browser and surf the web.
City
Manager's Agenda #8. Transmitting communication from Robert W.
Healy, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number
09-17, regarding a report on the possibility of creating a
publicly accessible, appropriately confidential database of broad
average or median neighborhood rents for retail space.
Though
I was skeptical about Councillor Seidel's original Order on this,
the information that came back from Director of Assessment Robert
Reardon is actually quite interesting. Here it is:
|
Average Retail Rents
per sq. ft. used for assessment as of January 1, 2008
based on 2007 data |
| Area |
Average Size |
Average Rent |
Median rent |
Max. Rent |
Min. Rent |
| East Cambridge |
4,938 |
$17 |
$16 |
$41 |
$12 |
| Kendall Square |
10,758 |
$28 |
$29 |
$38 |
$17 |
| MIT |
13,530 |
$29 |
$28 |
$41 |
$13 |
| Cambridgeport |
1,392 |
$16 |
$16 |
$27 |
$9 |
| Central Square |
4,764 |
$24 |
$25 |
$43 |
$10 |
| Cambridge Triangle |
2,189 |
$21 |
$20 |
$41 |
$12 |
| Harvard Square |
5,262 |
$68 |
$72 |
$140 |
$25 |
| Porter Square |
7,389 |
$32 |
$34 |
$48 |
$17 |
| North Cambridge |
3,136 |
$19 |
$19 |
$33 |
$9 |
| Alewife/West Cambridge |
8,189 |
$25 |
$26 |
$55 |
$12 |
| Citywide |
5,436 |
$32 |
$25 |
$140 |
$9 |
One
has to wonder who's paying $140/sq. ft. in Harvard Square and
who's paying $9/sq. ft. in Cambridgeport and North Cambridge.
Other information I would love to have is the differential in
rents between premium street frontage and the side streets and
back streets in places like Central Square. I've always felt that
all commercial districts in Cambridge would fare better if the
back streets and side streets were better developed for businesses
that cannot afford top dollar rents on the main drag. There really
is room for everyone.
Charter
Right #1. Transmitting communication from Robert W. Healy,
City Manager, Awaiting Report Item Number 08-141, regarding a
report on the possibility of awarding points to affordable housing
applicants based on the number of times an applicant has applied
for housing. [Charter Right exercised by Councillor Maher on City
Manager Agenda Number Four of Apr 27, 2009.]
There
is something perverse about this. In an ideal world, access to
publicly-subsidized affordable housing should be based on need and
suitability of the tenant for a given housing situation. Why
should "the number of times an applicant has applied" be
a criteria at all? It seems that this only creates an incentive
for people to apply early and often in order to get a better
position in the pecking order. It seems that affordable housing
programs (and other initiatives) are already subject to abuse by
those who are less than perfectly honest about their income and
need. This will not improve things to create other ways to game
the system.
Resolution
#26. Congratulations to Laura Nichols on the occasion of being
appointed to the position of Executive Director of the Cambridge
Consumers’ Council. Councillor Davis
I
note this Resolution only to again say what a great guy former
Executive Director (and now gentleman farmer) Paul Schlaver is and
that his successor Laura Nichols is cut from the same cloth as
Paul. I have often heard tales from residents of how helpful the
Cambridge Consumer's Council has been.
Resolution
#28. Thanks to the Central Square Restaurant Association
participants for their successful Central Square Clean Up on May
3, 2009. Councillor Davis
Order
#9. That the City Manager is requested to direct the
Commissioner of Public Works to increase the cleaning efforts in
Carl Barron Plaza, as well as other benches and areas in Central
Square where liquor bottles, cigarette butts and other forms of
trash are routinely discarded and render benches unclean and
unusable. Mayor Simmons
Order
#10. That the City council urge the License Commission to
consider requiring all licensed establishments to be responsible
for cleaning the cigarette butts and packaging in front of their
business or risk being fined. Mayor Simmons
Order
#16. That the City Manager is requested to confer with the
Commissioner of Public Works to direct DPW crews collecting trash
to clean out the trash and debris that collects and rots in the
metal trash cage the supports the barrel. Mayor
Simmons
These
Resolutions and Orders all seem to have grown out of the recent
First Annual Clean Cambridge Spring Cleanup. It's worth noting
that this wasn't really the "first" such cleanup. I
participated in a very significant Central Square cleanup with
City Year volunteers about ten years ago in which we did a lot of
graffiti removal in addition to a general cleanup. After this
year's efforts there was a noticeable improvement in Central
Square, but it took no time before the slovenly smokers clogged up
everything with their detritus. Would it be so difficult for the
bars and restaurants to hire or assign someone to clean up after
their patrons?
On
a related note, our dear friends at the Department of Public Works
really should methodically move up and down Mass. Ave. in Central
Square restoring or removing the steel grates at the base of all
the trees. They are a trip hazard now and really serve no useful
function. While there, this would be a good time to systematically
repair the brick sidewalks and replace the hundreds of
missing bricks.
Order
#1. That the City Manager is requested to confer with the
Director of Traffic, Parking and Transportation to determine
whether metered parking spaces in the East Cambridge residential
streets can be converted to residential parking due to the
decrease in courthouse traffic and increase in residential units.
Councillor Toomey
This
Order will likely be filed in the same wastebasket that Traffic
Director Susan Clippinger uses to file all of Councillor Toomey's
Orders. It's a shame, really, because there are many simple fixes
that could be made to make everyone's life easier. Parking meters
were installed in front of the old Longfellow School building
across from my house when the Main Library moved there. The
Library's now gone, but the meters remain. Virtually all of the
businesses on my side of Broadway are now residences or vacant,
yet the meters remain. In Somerville, they have many metered areas
where residents with stickers can park for free - an excellent
compromise, especially for those who wish to use metered spaces
just for overnight parking without having to move their cars at
8am. It sure would be nice if Cambridge could be as smart as
Somerville. While we're on the subject, whatever happened to
Councillor Toomey's request that the state-mandated
Cambridge Traffic Board be appointed that would be empowered to
review regulations made by the Traffic Director? Inconvenience is
no excuse for ignoring the law, even for department heads.
Order
#13. That the City Manager is requested to create a position
for a Green Streets Coordinator to continue the coordination of
the program currently performed by Janie Katz-Christy in recent
years which has created a sustainable initiative that is being
replicated around the world. Mayor Simmons
I'm
all for Green Streets and sustainability 'n stuff, but isn't this
the wrong time to be creating new positions in a bad economy?
Order
#14. That the City Manager be and hereby is requested to
consider a cost benefit analysis for refurbishing the former
bath-house at Corporal Burns Park so that it might draw income for
the city and simultaneously provide valuable service to residents
and visitors to the park. Mayor Simmons
As
long as Mayor Simmons is talking only about a park-related use,
this is a lot better proposal than what former City Councillor Ed
Cyr and others proposed in the early 90's. Back then their bright
idea was to create a "Land Bank" of properties on which,
you guessed it, affordable housing could be built. Included in the
proposal was the building in Corporal Burns Park as well as all
sorts of other small parcels around the city. Those were the great
days of the CCA's penchant for "solutions in search of a
problem." Thankfully, that trial balloon crashed.
Unfortunately, a decade later the City sponsors the development of
housing on any postage-stamp parcel it can deliver to its
nonprofit partners. Would it it be so dreadful just to leave a few
undeveloped square feet of land here and there around the city?
Must everything be built over?
Order
#17. That the City Manager is requested to direct the
appropriate city departments to increase the City’s responses to
a scale proportionate to the emergency and consistent with the
city’s own Climate Protection goals for 2010 and beyond.
Councillor Decker, Councillor Toomey and Councillor
Davis
Rumor
has it that quite a few people intend to speak on this Order. At
the risk of infuriating my environmentally conscious comrades, the
vagueness of this Order worries me. It highlights the rise in
greenhouse gases and calls for a "response proportionate to
the emergency." This could be interpreted to mean that the
ability to own and operate an automobile in Cambridge should be
made dramatically more expensive (even if you only occasionally
drive), and that every little change made to your home should go
through an onerous and expensive regulatory review. Everyone who
lived through Cambridge's rent control decades remembers how the
claim of a housing emergency was twisted into a justification for
oppressive and often idiotic regulations that were, in fact,
politically motivated. I want very much to see good environmental
initiatives in Cambridge, but I remain extremely wary of any
effort to use a perceived "emergency" as an excuse for
carrying out an agenda that will likely have very political
overtones. The efforts of the Cambridge Energy Alliance seem the
far more appropriate way to proceed, i.e. provide financial
incentives and technical assistance for people "to do the
right thing." - Robert Winters |
Superintendent's
Contract between Cambridge School Committee and Jeffrey M. Young
(HTML)
The First
Annual Clean Cambridge Spring Cleanup took place last weekend (Sat,
May 2 and Sun, May 3). Find out more at http://www.cleancambridge.org.
|
April
27, 2009 Cambridge City Council Agenda Highlights
Without
question, the most significant item on tonight's agenda is the
submission of the FY2010 Budget (City Manager's Agenda #1).
The annual Budget Hearings of the City Council's Finance Committee
will commence this Thursday, April 30 at 9:30am. Here is a list of
the items I found interesting, important, or ridiculous:
Reconsideration
#1. Reconsideration filed by Councillor Reeves on the adoption
of Order Number Thirteen of Apr 13, 2009 requesting the City Council
convey its wishes for the continuing publication of The Boston Globe
to the publishers of The Boston Globe.
Apparently,
Councillor Reeves wants the Boston Globe to die a painful death
along with the Cambridge Chronicle and any other media outlet who
has failed to meet his high standards of professional ethics. This
Order passed at the Council's April 13 meeting, but Councillor
Reeves would like another bite at the apple. The political cynics
among us might observe that it has been Mr. Reeves' political modus
operandi to always identify someone or something as his biannual
evil entity around which he can rally his campaign. This is really
the game of Al Vellucci who would rail endlessly against Harvard
University while at the same time have dinner with then Harvard
President Derek Bok. In 2007, Reeves' game focused on the Cambridge
Chronicle (and others) as persecutors of his noble reign as mayor.
We'll have to wait and see who he designates as this year's
political bad guy. The Boston Globe? Cambridge Chronicle? Cambridge
Health Alliance? Harvard University?
City
Manager's Agenda #1. Transmitting communication from Robert W.
Healy, City Manager, relative to the FY2010
submitted budget and appropriation orders.
The
FY10 Budget Book will be available after all the city councillors
get their copies. It will also be available online, and it's always
worth the read. Comparison with previous years' budgets is a good
exercise, especially now that things are tighter in the current
economic climate.
City
Manager's Agenda #15. Transmitting communication from Robert W.
Healy, City Manager, relative to the appropriation and authorization
to borrow $14,290,000 to continue sewer projects in the Harvard
Square, Agassiz, and Alewife Watershed areas of the City.
Perhaps
not so interesting to everyone, but this is the stuff that keeps a
city running and, say what you will about the City Manager, one
legacy of Robert Healy will be a dramatically improved
infrastructure in Cambridge.
City
Manager's Agenda #18. Transmitting communication from Robert
W. Healy, City Manager, relative to Awaiting Report Item Number
09-25, regarding a report on the installation of black fire hydrants
in West Cambridge.
This
grew out of an Order from
Councillor Decker which apparently sought to find fault in the
City's infrastructure in the wake of a serious house fire on
Lexington Avenue. See note above. In any case, it's interesting
information.
Order
#5. That the City Manager is requested to report back to the
City Council on what efforts can be done to increase the number of
Cambridge businesses and institutions that compost. Vice
Mayor Seidel
I'm
not so sure that this City Council Order will accomplish anything
other than to distract Recycling Director Randy Mail from the great
job she's been doing to promote organics recycling in Cambridge. For
your information, the possibility of residential curbside organics
recycling is on the table for future contracts for recycling
collection and processing. Whether or not it happens anytime soon is
a matter of relative cost.
Order
#6. That the City Manager is requested to report back to the
City Council on methods and policies that are in place to guarantee
that all residents have equal access to city information and
services. Vice Mayor Seidel
The
rationale behind this Order is to ensure that City officials do not
simply say "it's on the web" as the final word in response
to requests for information by Cambridge residents. This is a valid
point - not everyone has web access, and many simply prefer to get
information verbally or in print. It's abundantly clear that
widespread access to web-based resources has dramatically increased
the ability to deliver detailed information to residents, but
there's the risk (and the reality) that some officials will use this
in order to avoid assisting those with reasonable (and sometimes
unreasonable) requests. I would liken this to the development of
paved roads that made transportation much faster but which has often
made things more difficult for pedestrians and cyclists. The
information superhighway should not eclipse other avenues of
communication.
Order
#8. That the City Council request that the City Manager
consider the possibility of establishing multi-sector (public,
private, and university) partnership that funds a 24 Hour Drop-In
Center to provide a variety of essential services to individuals on
the street. Mayor Simmons
.....
which will, of course, be located in Central Square and further
secure its future as the City's favorite dumping ground.
Order
#12. That the City Council go on record as urging the
Cambridge Legislative Delegation to work to enact a municipal relief
bill that allows local option taxes and closes the
telecommunications property tax loopholes that give the telephone
company a $50 million tax break. Councillor Davis
Translation:
Councillor Davis would like to raise your taxes. This Order will
likely pass on a unanimous vote. - Robert Winters |
2008-2009
Goals of the Cambridge School Committee and Administration
|
April
14: NOTICE - The Cambridge School
Committee has been CANCELLED
OK,
perhaps not. However, right now I'm wondering whether or not it
should be. I have occasionally attended School Committee meetings
over the years and have been known to opine that their primary focus
is more about creating and maintaining School Department jobs than
educating young people. So, when it was announced that they were
having a Roundtable meeting on trends in mathematics education,
I was thrilled. Just once, perhaps, the Cambridge School Committee
would have a meeting that focused on educational specifics.
Alas,
no. With virtually no notice, the meeting was cancelled - not
postponed, just cancelled. Just a little notice buried deep in the
School Department website. Granted, this meeting was not going to
draw the crowds of the previous week when the race of the School
Superintendent candidates was used to get people all riled up. This
was just about mathematics - not race or class or gender or compact
fluorescent light bulbs or Salvadoran elections - just something
that young people might actually need to know something about if
they ever want to get a job in Cambridge some day (other than a job
in politics or the School Department).
I
showed up for the meeting and was informed by one of the more
helpful members of the School Committee that the meeting had been
cancelled "because we have to pass a budget." It's not
that I'm completely uninformed about what goes on around town - I
even try in my own way to let people know what's going on. I don't
mind wasting some time, but I really don't like it when others waste
my time. Inserting a cancellation notice in an obscure location just
doesn't cut it.
So,
to the Cambridge School Committee, you can now go back to talking
about all of your nonacademic issues. Let me know when I should next
walk to CRLS for something other than a letdown. Maybe, just maybe,
you'll grace us again with a meeting that focuses on educational
specifics. I won't hold my breath. - Robert Winters |
|
April
13 - There's not much to be said about the April
13 City Council Agenda. They'll have to do something with
the Decker-Reeves farcical Order (Charter
Right #1) to provide a City "stimulus package" to
Harvard and MIT, but my guess is that they'll just let it fade away
or refer it to the University Relations Committee to be properly
buried. There's a more adult Order #12 from Councillors Davis
and Ward on this week's agenda that speaks to the same issue:
Order
#12. That the City Manager is requested to urge Harvard, MIT and
other businesses to use the progressive practice of asking for
concessions from all employees at all levels before resorting to
layoffs of the lowest paid workers. Councillor Davis and
Councillor Ward
The
Order also calls for referring this to the University Relations
Committee, the only Council committee which has yet to meet even
one time this Council term. It would seem that this City Council
would prefer to lob grenades at Harvard and MIT rather than actually
have any meaningful discussions with university representatives.
I'd
love to see the Council do something in response to Councillor
Kelley's Order #4:
Order
#4. That the City Manager is requested to report back to the
City Council prior to the final June meeting on the City's plans to
enforce relevant laws about noise from motorcycles and loud cars.
Councillor Kelley
Of
course we've been down this road before - and it always leads
nowhere. Expect at least one councillor to suggest that cracking
down on ear-splitting car sound systems would be an infringement on
cultural rights and civil liberties. - Robert Winters |
|
April
7 - The Cambridge School Committee tonight voted 5-2 to select Dr.
Jeffrey Young as its next Superintendent of Schools. The next
step is to negotiate a contract. Voting for Jeffrey Young were Joe
Grassi, Marc McGovern, Patty Nolan, Luc Schuster, and Nancy Tauber.
Voting for Carolyn Turk were Fred Fantini and Denise Simmons.
This
was one of the most intense meetings I've witnessed in a long time.
Most of the people in the audience were very partisan supporters of
either Jeffrey Young or Carolyn Turk, and there is no question that
this partisanship was highly correlated with race. Indeed, once the
vote was taken many supporters of Carolyn Turk marched out of the
room shouting "status quo" even though the School
Committee had, in fact, just voted to make a change from
Interim Superintendent Turk to Superintendent Young.
Without
a doubt the most devastated of all the School Committee members was
Mayor Simmons. To this observer, it seemed she was doing everything
she could just to keep herself together. Even though all members had
pledged to work together regardless who was chosen, when Fred
Fantini (who had also voted for Turk) made such a motion, Mayor
Simmons voted "present".
From
my vantage point (and the luxury of not having to take sides on this
matter) I will state that this was a very adult decision from this
School Committee. This is not a comment on who they chose, but
rather about the courage they showed in making their decisions based
on what they really believed, regardless of political consequences.
There will be some political and personal fallout as a result of
this vote, but I can honestly say that my respect for all seven of
them went up a notch or two based on their courage and convictions -
regardless of who received their vote. - Robert
Winters |
|
April
6: March 30 and April
6 City Council Agenda Highlights and other Notes from the
Peoples Republic
The
March 30 City Council meeting was recessed at the start in
order that members could attend the School Superintendent dog and
pony show at CRLS, i.e. the first of two School Committee meetings
on consecutive days which should lead to the selection of a
Superintendent of Schools. The agenda of the April 6 City Council
meeting includes all of the March 30 items plus a number of new
items. The three Superintendent finalists are Dr. Mary C. Nash,
currently the Academic Superintendent for the Boston Public Schools;
Dr. Carolyn L. Turk, currently Deputy Superintendent of the
Cambridge Public Schools; and Dr. Jeffrey M. Young, currently
Superintendent of the Newton Public Schools. [Update:
Mayor Simmons announced at the beginning of the April 6 City Council
meeting that the choice is now down to two candidates - Carolyn
Turk and Jeffrey Young. The School Committee will go into
Executive Session at its meeting on April 7 at 6:00pm at CRLS in
order to deliberate. They are then expected to emerge at some point
and vote in open session to choose the next Superintendent of
Schools.]
I
have not followed the current Superintendent drama as it has
developed over the last several months, primarily because watching
this School Committee is like listening to the sound of fingernails
scratching a chalkboard (OK, maybe just some of the School
Committee members have this effect). There's also the "process
junkie" problem common to all too many decisions in Cambridge.
Elected officials strive for the appearance of public input -
whether or not they're actually listening. Then there's the
"consensus" goal common to Green Party aficionados like
Luc Schuster. Add to one School Committee member's need to come
across as technically proficient as she cherry-picks data to serve
her agenda and you have all the ingredients of a very bad movie.
Sometimes I think we'd be better off if the School Committee just
disappeared into a back room with a box of cigars and came out with
an announcement of who they're hiring. As a taxpayer, my greatest
concern is that the School Committee may have voted to piss away
$100,000 for a search process that was just political cover for a
decision they had already made before the search began. We may learn
the answer on Tuesday (April 7).
I
attended the first of the two Superintendent candidate forums, and
I'm sure we'll do just fine with any of the three candidates.
However, it was abundantly clear at the Monday night forum that an
effort to pack the hall with supporters of Carolyn Turk had been
undertaken. In a time when the race of the person to be hired should
be less of a factor, it is quite clear that there are some
who would make it a primary criterion. For example, former
CRLS teacher Larry Aaronson had an Op-Ed in the Cambridge Chronicle
titled, "Cambridge
School Committee vote is classic affirmative action in the best
sense". Comments on the Chronicle website (11 as of this
writing) are all signed by anonymous pseudonyms, and all of them are
shilling for their preferred candidate. There's also a copy of an e-mail
message from School Committee member Marc McGovern on the
Chronicle blog that hints at the overwhelming pressure being
directed at those who will vote on this. This "classic
affirmative action in the best sense" to which Aaronson refers
may well lead to accusations of either tokenism or racism by the
time the vote is taken, and one thing I would say about Cambridge is
that elected officials always tend to run for political cover
whenever anything with potential racial overtones comes up.
Here
are a few noteworthy items from tonight's combined agenda:
City
Manager's Agenda #1. Transmitting communication from Robert W.
Healy, City Manager, relative to the City of Cambridge retaining the
rare distinction of being one of approximately twenty-four
municipalities in the United States with three Triple A ratings from
the nation's three major credit rating agencies.
Resolution
#19. Congratulations to the City Manager and his fiscal staff
for achieving a Triple A bond rating for the City of Cambridge for
the tenth consecutive year. Councillor Toomey,
Councillor Maher
It's
the same story every year, but it's still worth noting that the
City's good fiscal health makes many things possible that other
cities cannot afford.
City
Manager's Agenda #10. Transmitting communication from Robert W.
Healy, City Manager, relative to the appointment of Peter Sheinfeld
as a Cambridge Election Commission for a 4-year term to expire Mar
31, 2013.
Congratulations,
Peter!
City
Manager's Agenda #14. Transmitting communication from Robert W.
Healy, City Manager, relative to the appropriation of a $50,000
Grant from the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative's (MTC) Clean
Energy Choice program to the Public Investment Grant Fund Public
Works Extraordinary Expenditures account. This grant will provide
funding to install two 2 kilowatt PV systems on the roof of the DPW
Frazier Administration building and the Frisoli Youth Center.
I
find this noteworthy primarily as an indication of a slow but sure
trend in the City toward environmentally smart initiatives. There
was a day when even establishing a recycling program was seen as a
radical change in the City. Now we're talking about photovoltaics on
DPW buildings, LEEDS-certified buildings, citywide energy
conservation programs, and even the possibility of organics
recycling (for composting).
Order
#11. That the City Manager is requested to report back to
the City Council on the process that will allow additional cable and
internet providers to do business in the City, and to clarify if
there are any obstacles in place that may need to be re-evaluated in
order to provide competitive options to residents.
Councillor Toomey and Councillor Davis
This
Order is similar to other Orders that have come before and gone nowhere.
One thing that's different now is that a wider range of TV
programming need no longer come into homes via coaxial cable, and
Internet access is now becoming available in other ways. One thing
not mentioned in this Order is the fact that with the switch to
digital broadcasting, there is the capacity to have MANY more
programming options available "over the air" with quality
reception. For example, there is no reason whatsoever why C-SPAN
could not be made available for free to every home via
digital broadcast. Same goes for all of the cable news channels that
derive most of their revenue from advertising. The City Council, as
well as state legislatures and Congress should be taking a much
broader look at the possibilities, especially in regard to news
and information programming.
Order
#12. Urge all residents to join with the volunteers of the
Clean Cambridge Campaign who will on May 2nd and 3rd, 2009, in an
effort to clean Cambridge sidewalks and neighborhoods.
Councillor Maher
I
once proposed that we should have an annual "Cambridge Day"
where all property owners would be encouraged to remove all graffiti
and generally clean up leading up to the Big Day. Some neighboring
towns have long held special days, e.g. Allston-Brighton Day which
has a parade.
Order
#13. That the City Council formally request that the Beal
Companies consider immediately withdrawing the zoning petition for
modifications of the One Kendall Square Cinema site and engage in
further dialogue with neighborhood leaders and affected neighbors
such that a full discussion can be had prior to any re-filing.
Councillor Maher and Councillor Toomey
The
cynic in me wonders if the real motivation for this Order is to make
sure that any deadlines for City Council action on such a zoning
petition would occur after Election Day this November. [Update:
Beal Companies has
apparently agreed to withdraw their petition for now.]
Order
#14. Economic stimulus package for Harvard and MIT.
Councillor Decker and Councillor Reeves
This
is classic comedy from this comic duo. For example, "Payment In
Lieu of Taxes" (acronym PILOT) has now mutated into
"pilot" in this Order. This should be be added to the
Council comic dictionary along with the verbs "charter
right", "charter wrote", and "charter
written". Regarding the substance of the Order, this one reads
like an Abbott & Costello routine (only less funny). Apparently
the genesis of this Order is the fact that Harvard and MIT have laid
off a handful of cleaning staff as part of their general economizing
during the current economic downturn. The comedy duo of Decker &
Reeves (not to be confused with Nichols & May, or Stiller &
Meara, or Burns & Allen) offer the following routine:
RESOLVED:
That the Cambridge City Council will introduce its own economic
stimulus package for Harvard and MIT; and be it further
RESOLVED:
That the Cambridge City Council will give the university a one-time
pass on partial payment of its pilot to the City of Cambridge in
order to help save these jobs; and be it further
RESOLVED:
That the City will forgive $398,372.00 of Harvard University's
pilot, which would cover the cost of the nineteen cleaners who would
lose their jobs; and be it further
RESOLVED:
That the City will forgive $70,688.00 of MIT's pilot in order for
then to retain the two laid off cleaners.
This
Order is plainly illegal (hey, doesn't one half of this duo
have a Harvard law degree) in its flouting of the state's Anti-Aid
Amendment to direct City money towards an institution not under
its exclusive control. It's also hysterical that the City of
Cambridge should be directing Harvard & MIT on their employment
practices. I insist that this comic duo file an Order for next
week's meeting granting me a tenure-track job at Harvard or MIT.
Hey, isn't that what constituent service is all about?
We
save the best for last:
Committee
Report #1. A communication was received from D. Margaret
Drury, City Clerk, transmitting a report from Councillor David Maher
and Councillor Henrietta Davis, Co-Chairs of the Government
Operations and Rules Committee, for a hearing held on Mar 19, 2009
to formalize job descriptions and administrative oversight for
assistants to city councillors.
When
the matter of "research assistants" first came up several
years ago, I stated that these were de facto political appointments
and that they should not, as such, be paid out of taxpayer money.
Reorganization or additional staff in the City Council Office may be
necessary and useful, but I never bought into the notion that every
councillor should get their own personal staff. The term
"research assistant" was and is a nonsense term invented
to obscure the reality of the job. This Committee Report implicitly
acknowledges this in proposing to change the name to "Aide to
City Councillor". Let me be clear that with but one exception,
I have no objections to these aides as individuals. Here's what we
have right now:
Councillor
Davis' aide used to be her campaign treasurer;
Councillor
Decker's former aides have been campaign managers and campaign
workers, and her current aide is a relative;
Councillor
Kelley has no "research assistant";
Councillor
Maher's aide is a long-time political supporter;
Councillor
Reeves' aide is a long-time political supporter;
Vice-Mayor
Seidel has not had an aide but is now considering it;
Mayor
Simmons has staff in her role as Mayor;
Councillor
Toomey's aide is simultaneously being paid out of his political
campaign account.
Councillor
Ward does not yet (as far as I know) have an aide.
Are
you detecting a pattern here? The main comment I made at this
hearing was that the job description for these aides is really the
job description of a city councillor, and that's who should be doing
the "research" and answering the letters and phone calls.
Being a city councillor was never meant to be anything other than a
part-time job, and judging from the other jobs held by most
councillors this remains the case. Councillors are nonetheless paid
a generous full-time salary. If you're paid full-time, you
should be able to handle all the responsibilities of the job, and if
there's an excess of work, pass it along to the office staff - just
as was done for many decades. If a constituent asks for something
that should properly be done by City department staff, forward the
call or e-mail to the appropriate department. If a City Council
subcommittee needs additional research, ask the City Clerk to make
the arrangements or hire the appropriate people.
It's
tough enough for challengers to go up against incumbents in a
municipal election without using taxpayer money to hire political
staff and supporters. - RW |

Excerpt from "Sketches of Boston, Past and
Present", by Isaac Smith Homans, 1851
Campaign
Finance Reports for Cambridge Municipal Election Candidates (2007 - March
2009) (PDF)
Cost
Per #1 Vote - 2007 Cambridge Municipal Election
| CC Candidate |
receipts |
expend |
#1
votes |
$
per #1 vote |
order
elected |
Notes |
| Moree, Gregg |
23000.00 |
23000.00 |
111 |
207.21 |
|
2007-2008 totals |
| Decker, Marjorie |
56680.22 |
54154.66 |
1069 |
50.66 |
5 |
2007-2008 totals |
| Reeves, Ken |
64080.26 |
60073.93 |
1217 |
49.36 |
4 |
2007-2008 totals |
| Murphy, Brian |
53971.09 |
50481.02 |
1160 |
43.52 |
6 |
2007-2008 totals |
| Toomey, Tim |
63651.15 |
51085.04 |
1339 |
38.15 |
2 |
2007 totals |
| Davis, Henrietta |
66454.54 |
60554.15 |
1592 |
38.04 |
1 |
2007-2008 totals |
| Simmons, Denise |
40131.00 |
34542.22 |
996 |
34.68 |
7 |
2007-2008 totals |
| Sullivan, Edward J. |
34560.00 |
28621.85 |
831 |
34.44 |
|
2007-2008 totals |
| Maher, David |
51000.00 |
40938.30 |
1312 |
31.20 |
3 |
2007-2008 totals |
| Seidel, Sam |
26994.75 |
29105.12 |
1037 |
28.07 |
9 |
2007-2008 totals |
| Kelley, Craig |
30658.47 |
25963.78 |
1118 |
23.22 |
8 |
2007-2008 totals |
| Janik, Jonathan |
5056.29 |
5056.31 |
261 |
19.37 |
|
2007-2008 totals |
| Ward, Larry |
11385.44 |
11302.60 |
699 |
16.17 |
|
2007-2008 totals |
| Moore, M. Kevin |
2760.00 |
1160.00 |
251 |
4.62 |
|
2007-2008 totals |
| Podgers, Kathy |
0.00 |
0.00 |
92 |
0.00 |
|
2007-2008 totals |
| SC Candidate |
receipts |
expend |
#1
votes |
$
per #1 vote |
order
elected |
Notes |
| McGovern, Marc |
26061.00 |
26260.40 |
2277 |
11.53 |
1 |
2007-2008 totals |
| Tauber, Nancy |
9756.91 |
9533.09 |
1246 |
7.65 |
6 |
2007-2008 totals |
| Schuster, Luc |
10760.00 |
12589.36 |
1680 |
7.49 |
4 |
2007-2008 totals |
| Nolan, Patty |
11828.19 |
12184.47 |
1672 |
7.29 |
3 |
2007-2008 totals |
| Lemily Wiggins, Gail |
6925.00 |
7266.29 |
1024 |
7.10 |
|
2007-2008 totals |
| Grassi, Joseph |
8709.61 |
8821.07 |
1629 |
5.42 |
5 |
2007-2008 totals |
| Harding, Richard |
6729.00 |
7710.60 |
1562 |
4.94 |
|
2007-2008 totals |
| Malner, Stefan |
920.01 |
574.41 |
133 |
4.32 |
|
2007-2008 totals |
| Fantini, Alfred E. |
6630.32 |
6114.00 |
2017 |
3.03 |
2 |
2007-2008 totals |
| Note:
Anthony Galluccio is not included in City Council candidate
totals. |
|
March
23, 2009 City Council Agenda highlights
Here
are the items I found interesting, important, or ridiculous:
Mgr
#3. Transmitting communication from Robert W. Healy, City
Manager, relative to the block
rates for water consumption and sewer use for the period beginning
Apr 1, 2009 and ending Mar 31, 2010.
Here's
the lowdown:
|
|
Annual
Consumption* |
FY07
Water
Rate |
FY08
Water
Rate |
FY09
Water
Rate
|
FY10
Proposed
Water
Rate
|
FY07
Sewer
Rate |
FY08
Sewer
Rate |
FY09
Sewer
Rate
|
FY10
Proposed
Sewer
Rate
|
FY07
total |
FY08
total |
FY09
total |
FY10
prop.
total |
| Block 1 |
0-40 CcF
|
$2.84 |
$2.84 |
$2.90
|
$2.98
|
$6.44 |
$6.44 |
$6.75
|
$7.28
|
$9.28 |
$9.28 |
$9.65 |
$10.26 |
|
Block 2
|
41-400 CcF
|
$3.05 |
$3.05 |
$3.11
|
$3.19
|
$6.82 |
$6.82 |
$7.15
|
$7.71
|
$9.87 |
$9.87 |
$10.26 |
$10.90 |
|
Block 3
|
401-2,000 CcF
|
$3.23 |
$3.23 |
$3.30
|
$3.39
|
$7.32 |
$7.32 |
$7.67
|
$8.28
|
$10.55 |
$10.55 |
$10.97 |
$11.67 |
|
Block 4
|
2,001-10,000 CcF
|
$3.44 |
$3.44 |
$3.51
|
$3.60
|
$7.89 |
$7.89 |
$8.27
|
$8.92
|
$11.33 |
$11.33 |
$11.78 |
$12.52 |
|
Block 5
|
Over 10,000 CcF
|
$3.72 |
$3.72 |
$3.80
|
$3.90
|
$8.39 |
$8.39 |
$8.79
|
$9.48
|
$12.11 |
$12.11 |
$12.59 |
$13.38 |
All
rates are per CcF (100 cu. ft., approx. 750 gallons). The water
rates are proposed to increase an average of 2.7% (compared to 0%
and 2.1% the previous two years). The sewer rates are proposed to
increase an average of 7.9% (compared to 0% and 4.8% the previous
two years). The combined rates are proposed to increase an average
of 6.3% (compared to 0% and 4.0% the previous two years). The City
Manager also reports that the annual combined water/sewer rate is
projected to increase by an average of approximately 5.7% each year
for FY10-14.
Order
#9. That the City Manager is requested to require
appropriate City departments and staff to begin collecting data
based on gender and to make available to the Cambridge Commission on
the Status of Women and all other departments the gender based data
while securing anonymity and confidentiality as appropriate.
Mayor Simmons
Though
I'm sure to get some nasty e-mail messages for saying so, this is
ridiculous. What's next, requiring weight, height, and tattoo
information in the annual City census?
Order
#13. That the City Manager is requested to obtain from the
Fire Department how many black hydrants are in the West Cambridge
area, and whether or not the number of black hydrants in West
Cambridge is relatively high in comparison with the rest of the
city. Councillor Decker
It
would appear that Decker is feeling the sting from the Mar 2
response to her Dec 15 Order about fire hydrant pressure during the
Lexington Avenue fire several months ago. Will there be an upcoming
Council Order establishing a Fire Hydrant Equity Commission? I'm
sure she'll want it to be fully staffed with health and dental
benefits.
Order
#15. That the City Manager is requested to report to the
City Council with a proposal to label trees at appropriate locations
to educate Cambridge residents. Councillor Davis
Great
idea, really - and simple and inexpensive. Just like at the
arboretum or the Mt. Auburn Cemetery. - RW |

I found this 1950s vintage photo of a DPW garbage truck
(a.k.a. "honey wagon") in an MIT collection. There used to be
separate food waste, i.e. garbage, collection back then. As one native
Cantabrigian commented, "I remember the simple pleasures of youth
sitting with my grandfather on the front porch on garbage pick up day on a
hot summer's day. The pungent smell would wrap the entire neighborhood and
every fly was on escort duty above the truck." Keep Cambridge
Clean!
Perverse
Cosmic Myopia - David Brooks, New York Times
My
favorite columnist, David Brooks, again hits the nail on the head
regarding Mr. Obama's handling of the current economic crisis: "The
president of the United States has decided to address this crisis while
simultaneously tackling the four most complicated problems facing the
nation: health care, energy, immigration and education. Why he has not
also decided to spend his evenings mastering quantum mechanics and
discovering the origins of consciousness is beyond me." The whole
column, as always with our Mr. Brooks, is worth the read.
|
March
16 Quiz Question: How many Cambridge voters have voted in
the last 20 elections without a miss, including all primary
elections? Are you on the list?
I just
loaded the latest registered voter list, the most recent street
listing, and all of the voter history files from November 1997 to
November 2008 into my database software. Anything else you'd like to
know???
--
Robert Winters |
This Old Land of
Cambridge - The true story of the geological history of Cambridge
- by George Ehrenfried
|
Shakeup
at the Election Commission
Anyone
who knows anything about the manner in which people are appointed to
the Cambridge Election Commission knows that it's all about
politics. Sometimes it's also about payback, and the Republican City
Committee is giving Republican Commissioner Artis Spears much the
same treatment that the Democratic City Committee gave former
Commissioner Sondra Schier in 1994. Commissioner Spears has served
on the Cambridge Election Commission since 1980, the longest of all
four current commissioners. Each political committee nominates three
people in alternate years from which the City Manager must choose
(by April 1) to serve for a four-year term.
Two
years ago, in 2007, the Republican City Committee forwarded a ranked
list of three nominees to the City Manager as their nominees: Peter
Sheinfeld, Fred Baker, and Ethridge King. Though not required to do
so, the City Manager typically chooses the first choice of the
committee, but in 2007 he passed over the top two nominees and chose
Ethridge King to fill the slot. The word at the time was that Artis
Spears had lobbied the City Manager heavily to appoint Ethridge
King. As one might expect, this did not go over so well among
Republican City Committee members.
On
Monday, February 9, the Republican City Committee met for their
biannual nomination meeting and chose Peter Sheinfeld as their #1
nominee on a 22-9 vote. Their 2nd nominee was Henry Irving on a
20-13 vote. Their 3rd nominee was Fred Baker on a 20-12 vote with 1
abstention. In each case it was a choice between two candidates, and
Artis Spears was defeated in each round.
The
rules governing the process are spelled out here: http://rwinters.com/docs/Acts1921Chap239.htm.
The relevant section is this: "SECTION 3. As the terms of the
several election commissioners expire, and in case a vacancy occurs
in said board, the city manager shall so appoint their successors
that the members of the board shall, as equally may be, represent
the two leading political parties, and in no case shall an
appointment be so made as to cause the board to have more than two
members of the same political party. Every such appointment shall be
made by the city manager from a list to be submitted to him by the
city committee of the political party from the members of which the
position is to be filled, containing the names of three enrolled
members of such party in said city, selected by vote of a majority
of members of such committee present and voting at a duly called
meeting; provided, that not less than thirty such members are
present and voting at such meeting; and every member of said board
shall serve until the expiration of his term and until his successor
has qualified. No appointment to said board need be confirmed by the
city council."
State
law does not specify that the list of three nominees be a ranked
list. This is a practice that both party committees choose to do in
an effort to have as much control as possible over the eventual
choice, but it has no legal standing whatsoever. |
|
It's
a Municipal Election Year
This year (2009) is an odd-numbered year and that means it's a
municipal election year. Normally we'd be hearing rumors by now
about who might be seeking a City Council or School Committee seat
in November, but Cambridge has been quiet. [Feb 5]
So.....,
as Tip O'Neill used to ask, "Whattaya hear?" Let
me know. Let's get those rumors flying. - RW
The
Rumor Mill:
The word is that Kevin
Moore (who ran for City Council in 2007) will throw his hat
in the ring for School Committee in 2009. We're still waiting to
hear about Richard
Harding and Gail
Lemily Wiggins. [as reported by Deep Throat]
The word
from our CCJ correspondent in South America is that Jeff Ross (one
of the four candidates who ran for Jarrett Barrios' vacant Senate
seat in 2007) may be interested in a Cambridge City Council seat.
[Feb 16]
Luc
Schuster wrote a
letter (Feb 20) in the Cambridge Chronicle stating that he
will not seek reelection to the School Committee later this year.
Feb 16
- With Brian Murphy's departure from the Cambridge City
Council (and Larry Ward's soon-to-be ascension to a Council seat on
Feb 24), there are rumblings in East Cambridge about assembling a
slate of candidates or recruiting individual candidates to seek a
Council seat. The fact that Brian Murphy was essentially the
successor to Jim Braude who was essentially the successor to Frank
Duehay may be an indication of where there are some votes to be had
this November.
All
City Council and School Committee seats are at-large seats, so you
can't absolutely say that any one councillor succeeds another, but
it's still a good first approximation. Few would argue, for example,
that Alice Wolf was succeeded in 1993 by Katherine Triantafillou and
Kathy Born (a twofer with Ed Cyr getting bumped in that election),
and Marjorie Decker's election in 1999 was clearly at the expense of
Triantafillou. "Mickey the Dude" Sullivan's seat was
passed to his son Edward Sullivan in 1949 and then to his brother
Walter Sullivan in 1959 who passed it on to his son Michael Sullivan
in 1993 who served until 2007. Lenny Russell was succeeded by his
wife Sheila Russell in 1985, and the "Russell base" was
effectively passed to David Maher in 1999. In recent years, the
changing demographics of Cambridge have created opportunities for
candidates like Craig Kelley and Sam Seidel, and those same shifting
sands together with changes in voter turnout could create further
opportunities for future candidates. That said, there's nothing like
the departure of an incumbent to create a scramble by other
candidates for the "base" of an exiting incumbent. The
Sullivan and Galluccio (Independent) bases are still very much out
there to be courted, and now you can add Brian Murphy's more
CCA-oriented base to the mix.
Though
it seems strange to have to say it, for those relative newcomers,
the CCA (Cambridge Civic Association) was a local civic/political
organization that was formed
in 1945 out of three entities that had existed from the 1930's.
The CCA aligned itself with the politically advantageous issue of
rent control in 1969 and essentially died when rent control was
wiped out in 1994. The CCA soldiered on and continued to endorse
municipal candidates through the 2003 election, though
half-heartedly at best. There have been no substantive organized
candidate endorsements since then, and the winners and losers are
now primarily determined by demographics and incumbency.
As
one measure of the votes that may be lurking out there for this
year's election, yesterday I ran the election software to determine
who would have been elected in the 2007 election if Brian Murphy had
been excluded. In that hypothetical, Edward
Sullivan (Michael's cousin) would have picked up the 9th
seat. However, under the "Vacancy Recount" provisions in
state law for Cambridge's elections, the vacancy will be filled
(officially on Feb 24) by Larry
Ward. The basic logic of the procedure is that a vacancy
should preferably be filled by that candidate who best matches the
exiting incumbent. However, there really is no obvious match in this
case among viable challengers. This observation should not be lost
on those considering tossing their hat into the ring later this
year. |
Pen
Portraits of Prominent People - by Henry J. Mahoney Editor, Cambridge
Sentinel - 1923
This book was published c. 1923 and features very witty
one-page “pen portraits” (with photo) of prominent Cantabrigians of
the day. I'll be adding names alphabetically as time permits. There are
182 portraits in the book.
It comes to mind that there may be some value in
expanding these profiles to other prominent Cantabrigians who arrived on
the scene after 1923, including prominent Cantabrigians of today. With
this in mind, I extend the invitation to any and all who may wish to
contribute their own “pen portraits” of Cambridge people.
Contributions do not necessarily have to be in the style of Mr. Mahoney.
Inclusion is, as always, subject to the erratic discretion of the editor.
Special thanks to Karen Welch for sending me the book. -
RW
|
Cambridge School
Volunteers is looking for people who can give one to
two hours per week to help students in the Cambridge Public
Schools, grades K through 12. No experience necessary. Call
617-349-6794 or e-mail csv@cpsd.us
for more details.
|
Oliver
Wendell Holmes – Morning Exercises of December 28, 1880
As recorded in the book 250th Anniversary of the Settlement of Cambridge
(1881)

Robert Winters, Editor
Cambridge Civic Journal
(about me) |
 |

The Cambridge Civic Journal is an independent
newsletter of civic affairs in the City of Cambridge, Massachusetts.
It is published as a public service by Central Square Publications.
All items are written by Robert
Winters unless otherwise noted. [Of course, I do sometimes
forget.]
|
Thought for
these times:
Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it
from religious conviction. -- Blaise Pascal |
Subscribe
to the Cambridge Civic Journal.
Specify in your message whether you wish to receive each new e-mail
version or if you wish to be notified when the online versions are
available at this web site. Under no circumstances will the subscription
list be made available to any third party.
“The Number One thing I would emphasize is that
journalists and bloggers would do well to see themselves as partners in
the provision of information and that each can benefit greatly from the
other. I’ve never seen this as a competition. It is especially true
these days that local papers and young journalists are not very
well-versed in the communities they serve. Much of the institutional
memory has either died out or been bought out.” -- Robert Winters,
mathematician and creator of the Cambridge Civic Journal, an online
publication about Cambridge, MA (rwinters.com)
|
Jorkin:
“Come, come, Mr. Fezziwig, we’re good friends besides good men
of business. We’re men of vision and progress. Why don’t you
sell out while the going’s good? You’ll never get a better
offer. It’s the age of the machine, and the factory, and the
vested interests. We small traders are ancient history, Mr. Fezziwig.”
Fezziwig:
“It’s not just for money alone that one spends a lifetime
building up a business, Mr. Jorkin…. It’s to preserve a way of
life that one knew and loved. No, I can’t see my way to selling
out to the new vested interests, Mr. Jorkin. I’ll have to be loyal
to the old ways and die out with them if needs must.”
Scrooge:
“I think I know what Mr. Fezziwig means, sir.”
Jorkin:
“Oh, you hate progress and money, too, do you?”
Scrooge:
“ I don't hate them, sir, but perhaps the machines aren’t such a
good thing for mankind, after all.”
Memorable
scene in "A Christmas Carol" |

|